Peacebuilding & Social Cohesion
Seven months on the Dollo Ado–Dollo Bay corridor, connecting two things that are usually funded separately: keeping the peace between clans, and giving marginalised women and young people a business of their own.
All seven tracked activities closed at 100%. Two of them reached double their target.
People reached — 315 women, 215 men
Participants in cross-border dialogue, against a target of 60
Women’s and youth groups given business grants
People reached through GBV and women’s rights campaigns
The approach
The project set out to strengthen both the formal and the informal mechanisms that hold communities together along the Dollo Ado and Dollo Bay corridor.
Border areas here are unstable for reasons that are economic as much as political. A young person with no income and no standing in the community is exposed to whoever offers both. A clan dispute over a waterpoint is also a dispute about who eats this year.
So Deris Wanaag worked on both sides at once: it built the capacity of local authorities, clan leaders and cross-border peace committees to mediate, and at the same time put working capital and business skills into the hands of women and young people who had been left out. Traditional peace structures and modern financial inclusion, run as one programme rather than two.
Results
The dialogues revived trust between clans and produced resource-sharing agreements. Woreda peace offices recognised the traditional mediation practices documented through the project as valuable for sustaining peace.
ETB 114,299.53 to each of ten groups, in enterprises the groups chose themselves — salons, tailoring, cafés, shops, fish selling, sports equipment — backed by training and follow-up mentoring rather than a one-off cash drop.
Participants reported better understanding of women’s rights and social inclusion, less tolerance of gender-based violence, and more willingness among men and boys to back equality work.
Both the cross-border dialogue and the refresher mentorship reached 120 people against targets of 60 — demand was higher than the design assumed.
What we learned
What worked. Working through the woreda administration was a strength, not an obstacle — roles were clear and relationships held. Community consultation before implementation is what kept the peace work credible. Group dynamics and leadership structures inside the women’s and youth groups were established properly, and every activity ran on schedule. Planning as a group let us map conflict-prone areas, causes and mediation routes together rather than from an office.
What was harder. The need in these communities is far larger than a seven-month grant can meet. Terrorist actors on the Somalia borderline continue to act as both pull and push factors on youth radicalisation, which undercuts cross-border youth solidarity. Our geographic coverage was limited, particularly in the Afder Zone. The administration and the peace and security office had no back-up resources for monitoring the security situation. Inflation kept eroding what the grants could buy. And granting to groups is a slow process — a lot of process, conditions and discussion before money moves.
Where we would take it next. Mass awareness work to stop young people joining armed groups; resources for the administration and peace offices to cover coordination, logistics and communication; expansion along the cross-border areas; rapid security and needs assessment; vulnerability mapping and market analysis; co-creation workshops with women and youth; and grants to individual marginalised women and young people, not only to groups.
Deris Wanaag showed that peace committees and business grants reinforce each other. Talk to us about scaling it across the border corridor.